Workflow-first testing
We follow complete user journeys, not isolated screens. This helps us catch issues in status changes, permissions, notifications, payments, approvals, and handoffs.
A small QA team focused on useful, real-world testing
Examen QA helps teams test web and mobile applications with a focus on workflow quality, regression safety, business logic, and real-world usability.

What we bring
We cover manual QA, exploratory testing, regression testing, test case design, bug reporting, no-code automation support, and workflow validation.
Our Approach
Examen QA is not built around simply clicking buttons and confirming pages load. We try to understand how the product is supposed to work, how different users will actually use it, and where the workflow may break.
We follow complete user journeys, not isolated screens. This helps us catch issues in status changes, permissions, notifications, payments, approvals, and handoffs.
We work best when we stay close to the development process. Early testing helps us catch unclear requirements, broken assumptions, and workflow gaps before they become expensive fixes.
We do not stop at reporting what is broken. When useful, we also point out confusing flows, missing validations, weak UX, and practical improvements based on experience across many application types.
Our strength is finding bugs and risks that are easy to miss in surface-level testing: edge cases, role conflicts, data mismatches, regression issues, and real-world usage problems.

What we test
Examen QA is a good fit for products where quality depends on connected steps, roles, records, statuses, and decisions.
Connected area
Tester's Toolbox will be a public collection of lightweight QA tools built from real testing needs, including bug report formatting, test case formatting, test data generation, checklist creation, and QA note cleanup.